Reclaiming Turtle Island: The Land Back Movement Explained
Across what is colonially known as North America, a powerful and increasingly prominent movement is gaining momentum: Land Back. Far from a mere slogan, it is a profound and multifaceted call for justice, decolonization, and a fundamental shift in land stewardship, rooted in the inherent sovereignty of Indigenous peoples. At its heart lies the concept of "Turtle Island," a name for the continent derived from various Indigenous creation stories, symbolizing a world sustained by traditional wisdom and a deep connection to the land.
The Land Back movement is not a monolithic entity but a diverse, Indigenous-led push to return stolen lands to Indigenous control and governance. It seeks to dismantle the legacies of colonialism, which have systematically dispossessed Native peoples of their territories, cultures, and self-determination. This isn’t just about ownership in the Western sense; it’s about restoring relationships – between people and the land, between Indigenous nations, and between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples. It’s about ecological restoration, cultural revitalization, and building a more equitable future for all inhabitants of Turtle Island.
The Historical Roots of Dispossession
To understand Land Back, one must confront the brutal history of colonization. For millennia, Indigenous nations thrived across Turtle Island, developing intricate systems of governance, sophisticated economies, and sustainable land management practices. These were abruptly shattered by European arrival, which brought disease, violence, and a rapacious drive for territory and resources. Treaties, often signed under duress or outright fraudulent, were systematically violated. Lands were seized, populations displaced, and cultures suppressed through genocidal policies like forced assimilation and residential schools.
The result is a stark reality: Indigenous peoples, who once held dominion over the entire continent, now legally control a mere fraction – an estimated 2.6% of the contiguous United States, for example. The vast majority of this remaining land is held in trust by colonial governments, not in outright, unencumbered Indigenous ownership. This dispossession is not a relic of the past; it is an ongoing process through continued resource extraction, industrial development, and legal battles that perpetuate colonial power structures. The Land Back movement directly confronts this historical and ongoing injustice, asserting that the only path to true reconciliation is through the return of Indigenous lands and the restoration of Indigenous sovereignty.
Beyond Ownership: Sovereignty and Stewardship
While the name suggests a singular focus on land, Land Back encompasses a much broader vision. It is fundamentally about sovereignty – the inherent right of Indigenous nations to govern themselves, manage their territories according to their own laws and traditions, and determine their own futures. This means challenging the authority of settler-colonial governments over Indigenous affairs and asserting the jurisdiction of traditional Indigenous governance structures.
A core tenet is "rematriation," a term that extends beyond repatriation to emphasize the return of land to Indigenous women’s leadership and traditional ecological knowledge. Many Indigenous cultures are matrilineal, and women historically held significant power in land stewardship and community governance. Rematriation seeks to heal the wounds of patriarchy imposed by colonialism and restore balance by centering Indigenous women’s wisdom in land management and community rebuilding.
Furthermore, Land Back is inextricably linked to environmental justice and climate action. Indigenous land management practices, refined over thousands of years, are increasingly recognized as vital solutions to the climate crisis. Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) offers sustainable alternatives to destructive industrial practices, emphasizing reciprocity, respect for all living things, and long-term ecological balance. As the rallying cry goes, "Land Back is climate action." Returning land to Indigenous stewardship promises not only justice for Native peoples but also a healthier planet for everyone.
Frontline Resistance and Key Campaigns
The Land Back movement manifests in diverse ways, from direct action and land occupations to legal challenges and educational initiatives. Several high-profile campaigns illustrate its urgency and impact:
-
Wet’suwet’en Nation (British Columbia, Canada): This nation’s hereditary chiefs have asserted their sovereignty over their unceded territory in northern British Columbia, resisting the construction of the Coastal GasLink pipeline. Despite a Canadian Supreme Court injunction and police enforcement, Wet’suwet’en land defenders at various checkpoints, most notably the Gidimt’en Checkpoint, have maintained their presence, highlighting the conflict between Indigenous customary law and colonial legal systems. The pipeline project, approved by elected band councils but not by the hereditary chiefs who hold authority over the broader territory, exemplifies the complex challenges of Indigenous self-governance in a settler state.
-
1492 Land Back Lane (Six Nations of the Grand River, Ontario, Canada): Near Caledonia, Ontario, members of the Six Nations of the Grand River have occupied a contested parcel of land since July 2020, stopping a housing development project. The land, known as McKenzie Meadows or now "1492 Land Back Lane," is part of a larger tract promised to the Haudenosaunee in the 1784 Haldimand Proclamation but never fully returned. This ongoing standoff underscores the failure of colonial governments to honor treaties and resolve historical land grievances, leading communities to take direct action to assert their rights.
-
Black Hills (Paha Sapa) – Lakota Nation (South Dakota, USA): The Black Hills are sacred to the Lakota people, stolen through a breach of the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty after gold was discovered. In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the government had illegally taken the land and awarded the Lakota over $100 million in compensation. However, the Lakota Nation has famously refused the monetary settlement, which now sits in a trust account exceeding $1 billion, consistently asserting: "The Black Hills are not for sale." This unwavering stance epitomizes the Land Back principle that land is invaluable and sacred, not a commodity to be bought and sold.
-
Urban Land Back Initiatives: The movement also extends to urban areas, where Indigenous groups are working to reclaim and rematriate small parcels of land for cultural centers, community gardens, and housing. Examples include the Sogorea Te’ Land Trust in the Bay Area, California, an urban Indigenous women-led organization that facilitates the return of Indigenous land to Indigenous people. These efforts often involve forming alliances with non-Indigenous allies who are willing to pay a "Shuumi Land Tax" or donate land directly.
Challenges and the Path Forward
The Land Back movement faces significant challenges. Legal frameworks, predominantly based on colonial property law, often make formal land return difficult. Political will from settler governments remains inconsistent, and public education is crucial to counter misconceptions that Land Back means displacing non-Indigenous people en masse. Instead, proponents often articulate a vision of shared stewardship under Indigenous leadership, emphasizing ecological sustainability and justice for all.
Despite these hurdles, the movement’s momentum is undeniable. Growing awareness of climate change, racial injustice, and the failures of colonial systems has spurred broader support. Indigenous youth are at the forefront, leveraging social media and direct action to amplify their calls. Allies in environmental groups, human rights organizations, and even some governmental bodies are increasingly recognizing the moral and practical imperative of Land Back.
Ultimately, Land Back is more than just a demand for territory; it is a vision for a transformed society. It calls for genuine decolonization – a dismantling of the systems of oppression that have harmed Indigenous peoples and the planet. By restoring Indigenous sovereignty, revitalizing traditional ecological knowledge, and fostering respectful relationships with the land and each other, the Land Back movement offers a blueprint for healing, reconciliation, and a sustainable future for all inhabitants of Turtle Island. It is a powerful assertion that justice, environmental health, and true reconciliation can only begin when the land is returned to its rightful stewards.
