The Long Journey Home: NAGPRA and the Sacred Imperative of Repatriation
For generations, the ancestors of Indigenous peoples in the United States lay not in sacred ground, but in museum drawers, university collections, and private hands – relics of a colonial past, subjects of scientific study, or mere curiosities. Their burial goods, sacred objects, and cultural patrimony were similarly dislocated, severing vital connections to living communities. This profound historical injustice, the desecration of graves and the systematic appropriation of heritage, began to be addressed with the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) in 1990. More than a legal framework, NAGPRA represents a moral reckoning, a commitment to healing, and a testament to the enduring spiritual and cultural ties Indigenous peoples maintain with their ancestors and heritage.
Before NAGPRA, the landscape of archaeological practice and museum curation was largely unchecked by Indigenous rights. From the late 19th through the mid-20th centuries, a frenzy of excavation, often fueled by an urgent desire to "save" what was perceived as a "vanishing race," saw countless Indigenous burial sites disturbed. Archaeologists, anthropologists, and even amateur collectors unearthed human remains and associated funerary objects with little to no regard for the spiritual beliefs or wishes of descendant communities. These collections swelled the inventories of institutions across the nation. By the time NAGPRA was enacted, it was estimated that the remains of between 100,000 and 200,000 Indigenous individuals, along with millions of funerary objects, sacred items, and objects of cultural patrimony, resided in federal agencies and federally funded museums. This immense cultural and spiritual debt underscored the urgent need for legislative action.
NAGPRA emerged from decades of relentless advocacy by Native American tribes, who demanded the return of their ancestors and cultural property. It mandates that federal agencies and museums that receive federal funding inventory their collections, consult with lineal descendants and culturally affiliated Native American tribes, and, upon request, repatriate human remains and cultural items. The law defines four categories of items subject to repatriation: human remains, funerary objects (objects placed with human remains as part of a death rite), sacred objects (items needed for the practice of traditional Native American religions), and objects of cultural patrimony (objects having ongoing historical, traditional, or cultural importance central to the Native American group). Crucially, NAGPRA also provides a process for the protection of newly discovered Native American graves and cultural items on federal and tribal lands, requiring consultation and consent before excavation.
The implementation of NAGPRA, while transformative, has been a complex and often arduous process. One of the initial monumental tasks for institutions was simply to identify what they held. Creating comprehensive inventories of potentially hundreds of thousands of individual remains and millions of objects, many poorly documented or misidentified, proved to be a Herculean effort. For tribes, the process of claiming their ancestors required extensive research, often into the very colonial records that had contributed to the disinterment, and the capacity to engage in protracted negotiations with institutions. Funding for tribes to undertake this work, including consultation, research, and reburial ceremonies, has consistently been a significant challenge, often falling short of the immense need.
Perhaps the most persistent and emotionally charged obstacle to full repatriation has been the category of "culturally unidentifiable" human remains. These are remains that, due to lack of clear archaeological or historical documentation, cannot be definitively linked to a specific present-day Native American tribe. For years, these ancestors remained in institutional custody, trapped in a legal limbo. However, significant amendments to NAGPRA regulations in 2017 and further refined in 2022 have sought to address this. The new rules shift the burden, making it easier for tribes to claim these ancestors by expanding the definition of "cultural affiliation" and emphasizing geographical and linguistic evidence, even without direct lineal descent. This policy change reflects a growing recognition that all human remains have a right to respectful reburial, and that the inability to definitively identify a single modern tribe should not preclude repatriation.
The Kennewick Man case, a deeply controversial discovery in 1996 of ancient human remains along the Columbia River, dramatically highlighted the complexities of NAGPRA. For nearly two decades, a scientific coalition argued against repatriation to a consortium of Plateau tribes, claiming the remains were not culturally affiliated and represented a unique ancient population. The legal battles were extensive, delaying reburial. Ultimately, in 2016, based on new scientific analysis and a reinterpretation of NAGPRA, the Army Corps of Engineers determined the remains were culturally affiliated with the claimant tribes, and the "Ancient One" was finally repatriated and reburied in 2017, a powerful victory for tribal sovereignty and the spirit of NAGPRA.
Beyond the legal and logistical hurdles, the return of ancestors and sacred items carries profound spiritual and cultural significance for Indigenous communities. Repatriation is not merely the transfer of objects; it is the restoration of balance, the healing of historical trauma, and the reaffirmation of identity. As Dr. Shannon Keller O’Loughlin (Choctaw), CEO of the Association on American Indian Affairs, states, "These are not just objects; they are our relatives, our history, our religion, our identity. Their return is a fundamental human right." Reburial ceremonies are often deeply moving and powerful events, reconnecting the living with their spiritual heritage and allowing for the continuation of sacred practices that were disrupted for centuries. The return of specific ceremonial objects can revitalize dormant traditions and strengthen community bonds, fostering cultural resurgence.
For institutions, NAGPRA has necessitated a fundamental shift in ethos – from collection to stewardship, from ownership to responsibility. Museums are increasingly recognizing their role as caretakers of cultural heritage rather than possessors, fostering collaborative relationships with tribal nations. This paradigm shift extends beyond repatriation, influencing exhibition practices, research methodologies, and the very understanding of cultural authority. It has prompted a critical self-examination of institutional histories and a commitment to decolonizing museum spaces and practices.
Despite the progress, the work of NAGPRA is far from complete. Thousands of ancestors and millions of cultural items still await repatriation. Many institutions, particularly smaller ones or those with limited resources, continue to struggle with the demands of the law. There are ongoing debates about the scope of "cultural affiliation," the application of NAGPRA to items held by private collectors (who are not covered by the law), and the need for greater financial support for tribal initiatives. The ethical imperative extends beyond mere compliance; it demands a proactive and empathetic approach from all parties.
In essence, NAGPRA is more than a statute; it is a landmark human rights law that seeks to right historical wrongs and foster reconciliation. It acknowledges the inherent sovereignty of Indigenous nations and their unalienable right to their ancestors and cultural patrimony. The long journey home for these remains is a testament to the resilience of Indigenous peoples, their unwavering connection to their past, and their determination to secure a future where their heritage is honored, protected, and respected. As each ancestor is returned to the earth, a piece of a fractured history is mended, and the sacred circle of life, death, and remembrance is restored. The journey continues, guided by the principle that all ancestors deserve peace, and all peoples deserve the dignity of their heritage.
..jpg "NAGPRA Law and Return of Indigenous Remains")
