Sacred Ground, Contested Futures: The Imperative to Protect Indigenous Religious Sites and Access
Across the globe, from the windswept peaks of Mauna Kea to the ancient rock art galleries of Australia, Indigenous peoples maintain an unbroken spiritual connection to their ancestral lands. These lands are not merely territory; they are living repositories of culture, history, and spiritual identity, often imbued with a sacredness that transcends conventional understanding. Within these vast landscapes lie specific religious locations – mountains, rivers, caves, groves, and ceremonial grounds – that serve as the very heart of Indigenous belief systems and practices. However, these sacred sites, and the communities’ access to them, face relentless threats from development, resource extraction, tourism, and a persistent lack of legal recognition and protection.
The struggle to protect Indigenous religious locations and ensure unfettered access is a fundamental human rights issue, encompassing religious freedom, cultural rights, and the right to self-determination. It is a battle for the soul of Indigenous cultures, demanding a global reckoning with historical injustices and a commitment to respecting the profound spiritual ties that bind people to their land.
The Indivisible Link: Land, Spirituality, and Identity
For many Indigenous cultures, the concept of a "religious site" is not confined to a single structure or designated area, but often extends to entire landscapes. Spirituality is not separated from daily life but is interwoven with the environment, the animals, the plants, and the very act of living on and caring for the land. Sacred sites are often places where creation stories are rooted, where ancestors reside, where ceremonies are performed to maintain cosmic balance, and where traditional knowledge is passed down through generations.
"Our land is our identity," explains a Navajo elder, echoing a sentiment shared by Indigenous peoples worldwide. "When you harm our sacred places, you are not just destroying a rock or a tree; you are severing our connection to our ancestors, our traditions, and our future." This holistic worldview means that threats to the physical environment are direct assaults on spiritual well-being and cultural survival.
A Litany of Threats: Development, Desecration, and Disregard
The threats to Indigenous sacred sites are multifaceted and often driven by powerful economic interests.
Resource Extraction: Mining, oil and gas drilling, and logging operations frequently target lands rich in natural resources, which often overlap with sacred Indigenous territories. The proposed Resolution Copper mine at Oak Flat (Chi’chil Biłdagoteel) in Arizona, sacred to the San Carlos Apache Nation, exemplifies this conflict. Despite the site being listed on the National Register of Historic Places, a land swap facilitated by the U.S. Congress threatens its destruction. As Wendsler Nosie Sr., a leader of Apache Stronghold, stated, "Oak Flat is like Mount Sinai to us – our most sacred site. It is where we go to pray, to conduct ceremonies, to gather our medicines and to connect with our ancestors. This is a holy place."
Infrastructure Development: Roads, dams, pipelines, and transmission lines cut through ancestral lands, fragmenting ecosystems and disrupting spiritual pathways. The Dakota Access Pipeline, which threatened the Standing Rock Sioux Nation’s water supply and traversed sacred burial grounds, became a global symbol of this struggle, galvanizing Indigenous and environmental activists alike.
Tourism and Recreation: While often well-intentioned, unchecked tourism can lead to desecration, cultural commodification, and restricted access. Uluru (Ayers Rock) in Australia, a deeply sacred site for the Anangu people, long suffered from thousands of tourists climbing its flanks, despite Anangu pleas. While climbing was finally banned in 2019, the challenge of managing respectful visitation remains for many other sites globally.
Lack of Legal Protection and Recognition: In many nations, legal frameworks fail to adequately protect Indigenous sacred sites. Laws often prioritize economic development or private property rights over Indigenous cultural and religious freedoms. In Australia, the destruction of the 46,000-year-old Juukan Gorge by Rio Tinto in 2020 for an iron ore mine exposed glaring deficiencies in heritage protection laws, igniting international outrage and calls for fundamental reform. The Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura (PKKP) Aboriginal Corporation described the destruction as "a devastating blow to our heritage."
Climate Change: Though less direct, climate change poses an existential threat to many sacred sites. Rising sea levels endanger coastal burial grounds, extreme weather events damage fragile historical structures, and altered ecosystems disrupt the availability of plants and animals essential for ceremonies and traditional practices.
The Global Framework: Promises and Pitfalls
International instruments offer some hope, yet their implementation remains a significant challenge. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), adopted in 2007, is a landmark document affirming the collective and individual rights of Indigenous peoples. Specifically, Article 12 states: "Indigenous peoples have the right to manifest, practice, develop and teach their spiritual and religious traditions, customs and ceremonies; the right to maintain, protect, and have access in privacy to their religious and cultural sites; the right to the use and control of their ceremonial objects; and the right to the repatriation of their human remains." Article 25 further emphasizes the right to maintain and strengthen their spiritual relationship with their traditionally owned or otherwise occupied and used lands, territories, waters and coastal seas and other resources.
However, UNDRIP is a declaration, not a legally binding treaty, and its implementation depends on the political will of individual states. Many nations, including those that voted in favor of UNDRIP, still struggle to translate its principles into domestic law and policy. The concept of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), a cornerstone of UNDRIP, which requires Indigenous communities to consent to any project affecting their lands or territories, is often disregarded or reduced to mere consultation.
Case Studies in Resistance and Resilience
The fight for sacred sites is a testament to Indigenous resilience and an ongoing global movement:
Bears Ears National Monument, USA: This vast landscape in Utah, encompassing ancestral lands of the Hopi, Navajo, Ute Mountain Ute, Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, and Zuni tribes, holds thousands of sacred sites, burial grounds, and cultural artifacts. Designated a national monument by President Obama in 2016 at the urging of an inter-tribal coalition, its size was drastically cut by President Trump, only to be restored by President Biden. This political seesaw highlights the vulnerability of sacred sites to shifting government policies, even when significant cultural and spiritual value is recognized. The Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition described the initial designation as "a historic moment for tribal sovereignty."
Mauna Kea, Hawaii: For Native Hawaiians, Mauna Kea is a sacred elder, the birthplace of their people, and a spiritual connection to the cosmos. The proposed construction of the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) near its summit has sparked decades of protests, known as the "protectors" movement. While astronomy views the mountain as an ideal location for scientific discovery, Native Hawaiians see it as a desecration of their most hallowed ground. The struggle underscores the clash between modern scientific ambition and ancient spiritual heritage, forcing a re-evaluation of whose values take precedence on contested lands.
The Way Forward: Towards Respect and Reconciliation
Protecting Indigenous religious locations and ensuring access requires a paradigm shift in how societies view and interact with Indigenous peoples and their lands.
-
Strengthening Legal Protections: National laws must be reformed to explicitly recognize and protect Indigenous sacred sites, granting Indigenous communities decision-making power over their ancestral lands. This includes enshrining FPIC into law and providing robust mechanisms for redress when sites are damaged or destroyed.
-
Co-management and Land Back: Implementing co-management agreements, where Indigenous communities share authority with governments over protected areas, can ensure that cultural and spiritual values are prioritized. Ultimately, the "Land Back" movement, advocating for the return of ancestral lands, is gaining momentum as the most direct path to ensuring Indigenous sovereignty and the protection of sacred sites.
-
Education and Awareness: Fostering greater public understanding of the profound spiritual significance of these sites can shift public opinion and build support for protection efforts. Educating tourists and developers about respectful engagement is crucial.
-
International Advocacy: Continuing to advocate for stronger implementation of UNDRIP and other international human rights instruments is vital to hold states accountable.
-
Corporate Responsibility: Corporations must adopt ethical guidelines that go beyond minimum legal requirements, engaging Indigenous communities meaningfully and respecting their right to say no to projects on sacred lands. The Juukan Gorge incident served as a stark reminder of the reputational and financial costs of failing to do so.
The protection of Indigenous religious locations and access is not merely about preserving ancient ruins or unique landscapes; it is about recognizing the inherent worth and continuing vitality of Indigenous cultures. It is about acknowledging that these sites are living expressions of human spirituality, indispensable to the well-being of Indigenous peoples and, by extension, to the cultural richness of all humanity. As the world grapples with climate change and a growing understanding of interconnectedness, the wisdom embedded in Indigenous relationships with sacred lands offers invaluable lessons for a more sustainable and respectful future. The imperative is clear: listen to Indigenous voices, respect their sacred ground, and safeguard their access, for the benefit of generations to come.
